VIDEO: PART 2: SCO 1993: STATUTES AND STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION

 Please follow the link below.

https://youtu.be/NudBQpXEEig?si=TsMw8aNbA1mjPrX7

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Alaska House Bill 7: A BILL THAT WOULD PROVIDE DUE PROCESS FOR JUDGES TO AVOID GRAND JURY INVESTIGATIONS

 Alaska House Bill 7: A BILL THAT WOULD PROVIDE DUE PROCESS FOR JUDGES TO AVOID GRAND JURY INVESTIGATIONS By Jessica Schultz Pleasant The State of Alaska has been a circus fair grounds for officials within the government and its courts. Citizens are feeling they are the enemies of their own State. Previous articles have described the Supreme Court Order 1993 controversy. A grassroots Alaska Grand Jury Association has been fighting against the new authorities given to the Alaska Attorney General and approved prosecutors. The new powers include a DA refusing requests against his client [THE STATE] from going before the grand jury for civil investigation into the state. Unbeknownst to many is Alaska House Bill 7 (HB 7). SCO 1993 changed Criminal Rule 6.1, which prevented Alaska’s 35 year judicial investigator Marla Greenstein just days before her subpoenaed testimony before the grand jury. Greenstein would be considered an “administrative judicial officer”. HB 7 doesn’t use the DA...
Read more

What judges are on the Alaska 2024 election ballot for retention?

Image
  What judges are on the Alaska 2024 election ballot for retention? How Alaska judges are selected According to the Alaska Judicial Council, the Alaska way of selecting judges is similar to other states. Alaska claims that it follows a merit system to select judges, and is similar to other states ways of selecting judges. These states believe this merit system is best to “achieve a fair, independent, impartial, and accountable judiciary. These judges are positioned by the governor of Alaska. The Alaska Judicial Council is a citizens’ council commissioned to review the history of judges and the Alaskan judicial system’s integrity. This council has not escaped citizen concerns of participating in the corrupted protection of crimes committed by Alaskan judges and the misconduct of other judicial officials. The Alaska Grand Juror Association (AGJA) was established unofficially by citizen’s worried about widespread misconduct and negligence throughout the judicial process. This group ha...
Read more

SCO 1993: VIEWPOINT DISCRIMATION SHUTS DOWN GRAND JURY INVESTIGATIONS INTO GOVERNMENT ABUSE

 SCO 1993: VIEWPOINT DISCRIMATION SHUTS DOWN GRAND JURY INVESTIGATIONS INTO GOVERNMENT ABUSE By Jessica Schultz Pleasant, The Conservative Fem Viewpoint based discrimination allows for only one group's opinion over another. The U.S. Supreme Court believes this type of regulated speech regulation the most “egregious”. A law that allows content-based regulation is exemplified by social media platforms banning sexually explicit material. An example of viewpoint discrimination would be a social media platform allowing only one political party to exercise their first Amendment. Alaska has a history of politicians that abuse their power being protected by the government. Governor William Sheffield was caught giving contracts to donors to his campaign. The grand jury report was withheld from the people of Alaska. The only reason the report was made public was because someone called the media to pick up the report in a courthouse waste bin. The grand jury investigation against Sheffield ...
Read more