Musk's Twitter Files released only validates what most people already knew

By Jessica Pleasant

December 7, 2022

On December 2, 2022, the popular and infamous social media platform Twitter was exposed by the new owner, billionaire, and entrepreneur Elon Musk of Tesla electric cars, for colluding with government agencies, politicians and mainstream media to censor conservative voices. Through Substack journalist Matt Taibbi’s Twitter account, Elon approved the release of documents confirming what conservatives have known all along; their free speech was under attack. At a time when Musk has been unbanning controversial Twitter accounts, the timing could not have been better to release the evidence. Those unbanned accounts have created an excitable return of followers, who are now seeing content they have been denied by the decisions of the elite and mainstream media.

For some Americans the documents released were a shock. For most Americans this has a sense of “old news”. The response from liberals on Twitter has exposed their lack of genuineness and integrity. Once Musk humiliated liberals by releasing the documents, most are now asking, “So what?” Or, questioning Musk’s values, because he chose to invest in to Twitter. On ABC’s show The View, actress Alyssa Milano, known for her role in the 90s tv series Charmed, believed she could choose a better way to help humanity. Musk responded to Milano’s call for Musk to solve world hunger with the $40 billion he used to purchase Twitter, by volunteering to sell off $40 billion in stocks if anyone can tell him how $40 billion could SOLVE world hunger.

It is not a new concept for the liberal democrat machine to tell citizens what they are allowed to be outraged about. The only stances against government issues are what they say they are. The only vocal opinions allowed are those of their own. When Musk made his fight the First Amendment the packs of liberals had the traditional and expected meltdown when their power over Twitter’s narratives began to wane.

Liberal logic and need for distraction has made a story about suppression of speech on Twitter to that of attacking the messenger. Matt Taibbi describes himself on Twitter as the author of Griftopia, The Divide, The Secrets of Drug Dealing, and Hate Inc. After the first release of the “Twitter Files”, the “Twitter Files Supplemental” was post December 6, 2022, after a delay when it was revealed a conflict of interests occurred during document vetting.

The man behind the conflict of interest was ex Twitter Deputy General Counsel Jim Baker. He was fired Tuesday Dec 6. During releasing documents readers began to see the name “Jim” being used. Jim Baker’s name was part of the correspondence within the Twitter Files. His participation in vetting the files was so explosive Taibbi delayed further releases until Baker was fired from Twitter.

Who is Jim Baker? Would you believe it if I told you Baker is connected directly to the Russia-Trump collusion conspiracy? Russia collusion with Trump was debunked within the criminal trial of Hillary Clinton’s attorney, Sussman trial. Sussman was the attorney that brought “user created” files as evidence of a Trump connection to a Russian bank. Proving the documents at the core of the allegations were fraudulent. This conspiracy was only kept alive by the mainstream media and the reality-deficient Twitter users. You were never meant to know these links, and if not for Musk’s purchase of Twitter, you never would have learned. 

According to Daily News writer Brian Niemietz, Twitter lawyer Jim Baker was fired over ‘suppression of information,’; per Musk. Jim Baker was fired for his role in the suppression of the infamous and disturbing Hunter Biden Laptop, which was suppressed just weeks before the presidential election in 2020. “Before being hired as deputy general counsel to Twitter, Baker was an FBI lawyer under former Director James Comey during the bureau’s probe of Russian interference during the 2016 presidential election.”

In a follow up release on Twitter, Matt Taibbi reported, “The news that Baker was reviewing the “Twitter files” surprised everyone involved, to say the least. New Twitter chief Elon Musk acted quickly to “exit” Baker Tuesday.”

Tiabbi further disclosed decisions made surrounding the Hunter Biden laptop censorship were often made without co-founder and former CEO of Twitter, Inc. Jack Dorsey’s knowledge. It is evident Twitter has been out of control and dictatorial power over information disseminated through the Twitter platform. The veil has been pulled away and we now see who are the ones playing Oz.

Sources:

Burbank, Luke. (2022, December 4) Elon Musk and Twitter: Is he in over his head? CBS News. Retrieved December 7, 2022. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/elon-musk-and-twitter-is-he-in-over-his-head/

Bailey, Kayla. (2022, December 3) Elon Musk's 'Twitter Files' increase suspicion Dems have 'deputized' Big Tech to police speech, warns Bongino. Fox News. Retrieved December 7, 2022. https://www.foxnews.com/media/elon-musks-twitter-files-increase-suspicion-dems-deputized-big-tech-police-speech-warns-bongino

Gregersen, E. (2022, October 28). Elon Musk. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Elon-Musk

Reilly, Patrick. (2022, December 3) Who is Matt Taibbi, journalist behind Hunter Biden 'Twitter files. New York Post. Retrieved December 7, 2022. https://nypost.com/2022/12/03/who-is-matt-taibbi-journalist-behind-hunter-biden-twitter-files/


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A List of Alaska Appellate Court Cases Involving Patterns of OCS Abuse of Families

 Hello, I am Jessica Schultz Pleasant. I hope this research will help women of Alaska in the middle of OCS abuse accusations. I am a paralegal, and as such I am not represented as an attorney and I can not give legal advice. This list is just a resource for making your case when you see the dark side of our government. I will provide links to each case and I will likely end up giving a description to make this resource more reader friendly. This list will begin with the most recent. I hope this is helpful. Stay strong, Mothers. And a Happy Belated Mothers’ Day. Take care! Alaska Supreme Court Decisions 2022 1. Dapo v. Dept. of Health & Soc. Svcs     Date: May 13, 2022 Docket Number: S-17878 https://law.justia.com/cases/alaska/supreme-court/2022/s-17878.html 2. K.J. (Mother) v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCS (Unpublished)   Date: January 5, 2022 Docket Number: S-18040 https://law.justia.com/cases/alaska/supreme-court/2022/s-18040.html Alaska Supreme Court Decision...
Read more

The Frailties of Alaska's SCO 1993

Image
The Frailties of Alaska's Supreme Court 1993 By Jessica Schultz Pleasant Since statehood in 1959 Alaskans have enjoyed a process outside the inbred court system to demand justice for official wrongdoing through an independent grand jury. Most Alaskans do not need to know about this aspect of our government established in the Alaska Constitution until they are wronged in a way that requires extraordinary means for achieving justice. Kenai Resident, David Haeg , sought this means for gaining justice over some 18 years. He has claimed he was framed by the AK Department of Fish & Game and was denied an independent grand jury. Once heard, the grand jury issued an indictment of Retired Judge Margaret Murphy for perjury. She is now experiencing the AK Justice system from the other side of the bench. Retired Homer Judge Indicted for Perjury https://theconservativefem.blogspot.com/2023/05/kenai-judge-indicted-for-perjury-has.html Parents harmed by the AK Office of Children’s Services ...
Read more

The Alaska Grand Jury: The State's "Need for Process" Scam

  On March 15th 2022, Alaskans protested outside courthouses across Alaska. They demanded the Alaska Supreme Court overrule its Order 1993 (SCO 1993). With essentially no input by members of The Alaska's Legislature's Rules Committee, the highest court had created rule 6.1 formed of whole cloth. The Legislature’s Rules Committee reviews language with recommendations from Legislative Legal for constitutionality. That didn’t happen in this case because it was a reactionary act responding to demands of Alaskans for accountability. This new law restricts citizens’ rights to petition the grand jury to investigate into official misconduct. The subject of grand jury process has been debated for centuries, there was no need to rush. Except, the rules were changed and enacted just weeks before a subpoenaed testimony of Alaska’s lead judicial investigator Marla Greenstein, as she has had the role for nearly 35 years. According to the Peninsula Clarion, the Kenai Peninsula Borough As...
Read more